Hastings Development, LLC, an insured under a policy issued by Evanston Insurance Company, sought coverage for a personal injury claim brought by an employee of another company who was injured while working on a mixing machine owned by Hastings. The insurance company denied coverage citing to the Employer Exclusion contained in the policy. We commenced a declaratory judgment action in the Eastern District Federal Court. We argued that the exclusion, when analyzed in conjunction with the separation of insured’s language contained in the policy, required Evanston to defend and indemnify Hastings. The court agreed that the exclusion did not preclude coverage and granted our motion for summary judgment.